On 15 June 2012 01:22, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote: > A wonder if this wart is hairy enough, that we wouldn't be justified in some > explicit backwards compatibility hackery in the spec. to remove it. > > For example, we could allow it to appear in parameter lists and provide a > dynamic check to ensure that nothing (other than a real undefined) is > passed. Similarly we could explicitly allow: > var undefined;
Actually, for very much the same effect, you could simply treat 'undefined' as a (refutable) _pattern_ that is only matched by the undefined value. No need to make special rules for var or parameters then. /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
