On 15 June 2012 12:41, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:

> This isn't unrelated. If we do get patterns into Harmony they may subsume
> some of the postfix-?? (which does not work syntactically, IMHO) or
> prefix-? ideas. Or at least prefix-? may show up in the pattern language
> (dherman and I have discussed it).


I was talking about the discussion around making undefined non-redefinable.
Of the first 6 responses, one was about the original subject (having a
unary version of ??), the others were about whether undefined should be
redefinable. Different (and potentially useful) topic, in my view. Allen
even opened with "This is a different issue, but..."

-- T.J.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to