On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:33 AM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote:

> As for null, I can see how there's confusion about whether to use null vs
> undefined, and so I can see why CoffeeScript would just try to blur the
> distinction between them.
>

Not just for blurring. Rejecting `null` is essential for CoffeeScript's
"existence" due to `?.`, the soak/safe access operator.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to