satyr wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:33 AM, David Herman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
As for null, I can see how there's confusion about whether to use
null vs undefined, and so I can see why CoffeeScript would just
try to blur the distinction between them.
Not just for blurring. Rejecting `null` is essential for
CoffeeScript's "existence" due to `?.`, the soak/safe access operator.
Can you give a real-world example where null rather than undefined is
soaked up? I'm guessing DOM but guessing is bad (cf. Sherlock Holmes).
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
