Not sure that something better than “template string” exists. It would have to be something that describes the construct well: It is an interesting hybrid between a literal (such as a regular expression) and a function call.
On Aug 3, 2012, at 23:38 , Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote: >> So switching to "template strings" is a good idea. We do need to communicate >> that they are not limited to strings, though: template parameters and tag >> results can be >> arbitrary ES objects/values. > > I chose "template string" over "string template" to emphasize that it was a > template that was expressed as a string rather than a template for a string. > That may be too subtle of a distinction. At the TC39 there were some > concerns that simply "template" was too general and might cause confusion > relative to other templating mechanism. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
