Le 27/08/2012 21:22, Kevin Smith a écrit : > > A last alternative is to associate private data via a WeakMap (it > can be shimmed in ES5 with the same garbage collection properties > and with good performances) that inherited functions all have > access to. It works, but it's burdensome and doesn't read as well > as object properties. > > > On the other hand, private names seem to add complexity to proxies A huge share of this complexity has been removed in recent discussions [1]. Conclusions seem to have reach consensus on es-discuss, but nothing has been officially accepted by TC39
> and mixin composition. What do you mean? Private name allow to do mixins without collision. It seems to reduce the complexity than increasing it in my opinion. David [1] See discussion starting at https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-July/024212.html
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
