On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: > > I've always viewed enumerability as an implied intent of sharing. Copying > > non-enumerable properties is a violation of my expectations (I assure you, > > I'm not alone) > > > That is an interesting point. Does the prevention of sharing ever occur in > practice (apart from hiding the methods of built-in prototype objects from > for...in)? In my experience, this is extraordinarily rare (so much that I can't think of any relevant code bases)
Rick > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > home: rauschma.de (http://rauschma.de)twitter: twitter.com/rauschma > (http://twitter.com/rauschma) > blog: 2ality.com (http://2ality.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
