> Why go purposefully against the existing terminology of the JavaScript > ecosystem? Just say “deferred” where you have “promise” and “promise” where > you have “future” and you avoid needless confusion and conflict. >
I prefer to find the optimal solution first and then consider migration costs later. I think migration costs are in general overstated in these matters (I made that mistake a couple of years ago with modules). Plus, "Deferred", seriously? It's not even a noun. : ) - Kevin
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
