On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think you did coin "1JS". What do you mean by it? Does it bear on
>> the present issue or not?
>
> I coined the "just one JavaScript" here:
>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-December/019112.html
>
> And it got shortened to 1JS not long after (maybe in the same thread?). The
> key point was no (new) opt-in for ES6. If you read the message (see the
> "Modules as the opt-in for new semantics" section), you'll see that I
> actually proposed that anything that can't be made to work in legacy code can
> be left out of sloppy mode.
Excellent. Thanks for the clarification. Sorry again for the confusion.
>
> Dave
>
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
