Brendan Eich wrote:
Brendan Eich wrote:
To tolerate o = null and o = undefined (which is not what o.p?.q
does), the equivalence would be:
I forgot to avoid the other slop, implicit ToObject conversion.
Correcting:
"To tolerate primitive type value in o (which is not what o.p?.q
does), the equivalence would be:"
Er, strike that -- not what CoffeeScript does, not wanted.
But this raises an issue: should ? applied to the whole object (o?.p in
expression, {p:q}? = o in pattern language) also cause an implicit
ToObject(o)?
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
