Le 09/01/2013 21:57, Andrea Giammarchi a écrit :
Last, but not least, even offline DOM proxies are pointless, here
another example without putting them in the DOM
What's an "offline DOM Proxy"?
var p = new Proxy(
document.createElement("p"),
{}
);
try {
p.appendChild(
That's what you call "without putting them in the DOM"? ;-)
What are you going to do when your proxy node has a child? Probably put
it on the DOM eventually, I guess, no?
document.createElement("span")
);
} catch(o_O) {
console.log(o_O.message);
}
try {
p.appendChild(
new Proxy(
document.createElement("span"),
{}
)
);
} catch(o_O) {
console.log(o_O.message);
}
So, as it is right now, there is not a single reason to make them valid as new
Proxy target, IMHO
Membrane and avoiding the cost of the shadow target sounds like a good
enough.
David
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
