On 28 January 2013 19:45, Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just wrote up a strawman on the wiki to summarize the recent debates about > the interaction between proxies and private symbols: > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:proxy_symbol_decoupled > > The page actually lists two proposals, out of which I prefer the second one. > > If I forgot some benefits/drawbacks of either approach, please speak up.
Under the second approach, how can you transparently proxy an object with private properties _at all_? It seems like you can't, even when you have access to its private names. In other words, what do you mean by "inherit the private state of the target", when the target is still aliased and accessed? /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
