Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
which part is LOL about caller I don't get it and LOL as argument,
from you, is more LOL than caller, IMO.
Sad to see this attitude 'cause I've raised a problem that cannot be
transpired, what here and there many of you are convinced is the right
thing to do in order to have graceful migration to new standards.
You're not taking the point that languages grow their kernel semantics,
which means not everything desugars to older versions via
"transpilation". This is part of the Harmony
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:harmony
"Minimize the additional semantic state needed beyond ES5" does not mean
"Minimize to zero".
Sorry for LOLs, I just think given the fact that some semantics are new
must be accepted, and transpilers may have to work harder and at the
edges be compilers with more complex runtimes. But as I tried to
suggest, for most -- or let's say "much" -- code there's a simpler
translation.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
