Thanks James, for your input. As an aside, I want to make perfectly clear
that I don't think the AMD approach to module IDs is necessary a bad thing,
or that full "http" URLs are necessarily any better for dependency naming.
I am arguing that AMD resolution semantics should not be baked in.
I am arguing that URLs should be the only *default* means of specifying
external modules in the browser, with standard URL semantics.
I am arguing that we should not bake *any* package dependency resolution
strategy into the core module system. Especially not something as "fuzzy"
as module IDs.
{ Kevin }
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
