On 7 May 2013 20:49, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If module names were URLs, that would definitely be the right thing. >> >> Module names aren't URLs, though. These aren't static links to static >> locations (for reasons discussed in this thread; e.g., it'd be >> counterproductive for backbone.js to have a static URL for underscore >> embedded in it). > > Well, they're not URLs *except* when they are URLs - that's the problem.
Right. Sam, Jason, I'm sorry, but I really can't follow your line of reasoning on this. Aren't you just papering over a problem by defining it away with convenient wording? /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
