On 8 May 2013 18:06, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 08/05/2013 08:01, Andreas Rossberg a écrit : > >> On 8 May 2013 07:10, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> What would be gained by >>> moving the property alone to Annex B? If nothing, then I think this >>> consistency should win. >> >> JavaScript implementations in new or existing eco systems that are not >> poisoned by web legacy wouldn't be obliged to support it. It's the >> difference between acknowledging web reality and forcing web reality >> on everybody. > > What are you saying? V8 releases versions where annoying and ugly de facto > standards are out so that software built on top of Node.js, MongoDB and > other embedders only use a cleaner JS? Awesome! ;-)
That would be an option -- I'd very much like to move some of these things behind a flag. /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
