On 8 May 2013 22:58, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Andreas Rossberg wrote: >> >> On 8 May 2013 18:06, David Bruant<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 08/05/2013 08:01, Andreas Rossberg a écrit : >>> >>>> On 8 May 2013 07:10, Mark Miller<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What would be gained by >>>>> moving the property alone to Annex B? If nothing, then I think this >>>>> consistency should win. >>>> >>>> JavaScript implementations in new or existing eco systems that are not >>>> poisoned by web legacy wouldn't be obliged to support it. It's the >>>> difference between acknowledging web reality and forcing web reality >>>> on everybody. >>> >>> What are you saying? V8 releases versions where annoying and ugly de >>> facto >>> standards are out so that software built on top of Node.js, MongoDB and >>> other embedders only use a cleaner JS? Awesome! ;-) >> >> That would be an option -- I'd very much like to move some of these >> things behind a flag. > > But not __proto__ -- dream on if you think that is going away any time soon!
I was thinking about V8 embedders other than browsers who could toggle that flag. And I absolutely do think that should be an option supported by the spec. To Annex B with it! (And let's bury setPrototypeOf quickly.) /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
