Mike Stay wrote:
No change to the syntax, no change to the iterator semantics, and a compatible change to the flattening semantics (assuming the existence of Array.prototype.flatten).
The nested arrays cost, and no one wants 'em for the single [] comprehension case. If you want a tree of arrays, you can nest comprehensions. Therefore this will be an optimization burden for no gain in the common case.
What's wrong with functional style when you mean it? Comprehensions are about sugaring the common case.
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
