On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> André Bargull wrote: > >> No one wants arguments in arrows. >>> >>> The question is, should an outer arguments binding be visible? I think >>> so, now that Jason raises the question. >>> >> >> This is a different position from [1], isn't it? The notes from January >> [2] as well as [3] might be of interest, too. >> > > Thanks for the reminder -- I should have remembered this. > > My appeal to arguments.callee was kind of a torture-test for why arrow > bodies should not be strict by fiat. But it shouldn't prevail if we think > "expression TCP" is more valuable. I'd be interested in Jason's thoughts > here. > No strong opinion. "Expression TCP" is nice, but not very valuable. Assuming we do not want `arguments` bindings in arrows, I guess using arguments in an arrow is almost certainly a mistake and should be a SyntaxError. We shouldn't be motivated either way by a desire to support arguments.callee! -j
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
