Mark S. Miller wrote:
Cool. That means we get a decent naming precedent for the monad ops,
and consistency with Array.of (which also happens to be a monadic
lifter, if you limit yourself to calling it with only a single
argument).
I agree that this naming analogy is a good thing. I raise my approval
magnitude to +1 ;).
Bart: Are we there yet?
Homer: Just a little further...
Bart: Are we there yet?
Homer: Just a little further...
etc.
Can someone summarize for those of us who accidentally skipped a bunch
of unread messages here? It sounds good from the last post ;-).
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
