On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> > wrote: > ... > > A negative is that it was decided that concise methods definitions create > enumerable properties and I don't think we really want these showing up in > for-in enumerations. Maybe we would want to revisit that decisions or at > least make an exception for concise methods (or accessors) defined using > explicit string literal names. > > The whole point of making them enumerable was to undo a decision to that made > an exception for concise methods—that applies to properties that were defined > with string literal names > (https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2012-09/sept-18.md#concise-method-definition-revisited) > > var o = { > "method": function() {} > }; > > Should behave exactly the same as > > var o = { > "method"() {} > };
Maybe the exception could be enumerability exception could be concise methods with string literal property names that do not parse as IdentifierName. Allen
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
