On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:19:52 +0200, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Bynens <math...@qiwi.be> wrote:
On 8 Oct 2013, at 19:59, Allen Wirfs-Brock <al...@wirfs-brock.com>
wrote:
> The Ecma General Assembly has approved by letter ballot Ecma-404: THE
JSON Data Interchange Formal
> See
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm
As for Unicode, it explicitly refers to Unicode 6.2.0, even though
version
6.3.0 was released last week.
The document was written in July, which was before last week.
The document says
[[
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application
of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies.
For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document
(including any amendments) applies.
ISO/IEC 10646:2012, Information Technology – Universal Coded Character Set
(UCS)
The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 6.2.0, (Mountain
View, CA: The Unicode
Consortium, 2012. ISBN 978-1-936213-07-8)
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.2.0/.
]]
AFAICT it's a dated reference, so only 6.2.0 applies. Was there a reason
to not use an undated reference, i.e. latest Unicode?
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
