JSON must not change. If it refers to "the latest Unicode, whatever that is", then it is potentially subject to disruption by (admittedly unlikely) future changes to Unicode.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 Oct 2013, at 22:19, Rick Waldron <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As for Unicode, it explicitly refers to Unicode 6.2.0, even though > version 6.3.0 was released last week. > > > > The document was written in July, which was before last week. > > No need to get snarky. > > Why not just refer to http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/, i.e. the > latest available Unicode version? The version number doesn’t really matter > for JSON as all it cares about is the concept of “code points”, the range > of which is fixed. > > Sorry for not raising this earlier, I must’ve missed the call for feedback > in/before July. > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
