On Oct 13, 2013 4:40 AM, "Andrea Giammarchi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> However, Russell's counter-argument that fallback in older browsers to loading lots of little files, request by request, from the server directory hierarchy, may be too painful, reducing the value as a migration technique. > > > this is what happens today with external CDN scripts and/or AMD like solutions regardless ... if these are not bundled all together, isn't it?
To me at least, the primary difference there is that in that case it is in the authors hand whereas native feature support is in the hands of the user agent, creating a potentially huge and unmanageable perf delta in the short/medium term.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
