On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18 Oct 2013, at 10:48, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote:
>> When you phrase it like that, I see another problem with
>> codePointAt(). You can't just replace existing usage of charCodeAt()
>> with codePointAt() as that would fail for input with paired
>> surrogates. E.g. a simple loop over a string that prints code points
>> would print both the code point and the trail surrogate code point for
>> a surrogate pair.
>
> I disagree. In those situations you should just iterate over the string using
> `for…of`.
That seems to iterate over code units as far as I can tell.
for (var x of "💩")
print(x.charCodeAt(0))
invokes print() twice in Gecko.
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
