On 14 Feb 2014, at 19:59, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's a really high bar to get over that closed gate. Unless the exclusion of > a feature was a mistake […] I don't think we should be talking about adding > it to ES6. It does feel like a mistake to me to introduce `String.prototype.codePointAt`, but no similar function that returns the symbol instead. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
