André Bargull <mailto:[email protected]>
October 29, 2013 11:46 AM
No. ;-)
What's wrong with me? Have I become a Rubyist, LOL?
Thanks, clearly under-caffeinated today.
/be
js> 1.*2
2
- André
Brendan Eich <mailto:[email protected]>
October 29, 2013 11:39 AM
Got it, thanks. We could indeed do .+, .*, etc. without ambiguity.
(Ignore E4X's wildcards: xml.* etc.!)
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
