Brendan Eich wrote:
Tristan Zajonc wrote:
What about +:? This actually has some visual appeal if primary
motivation is elementwise operations and is a syntax error with that
ASI example. The downside is that it can end up pretty close to
existing syntax like {a+:1} vs. {a:+1}, although I don't expect that
to be a common use.
Yeah, that could work. We're unlikely to use : as a prefix operator
due to ?:, and even less likely (as in 0) as an infix operator (note:
not type annotation separator in declarations) due to labels.
Warming up to +:, *:, etc. Thanks for this suggestion!
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
