On Nov 10, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> I think I've completely missed the `undefined === absent` conversation ... so 
> if I have an object, and `obj.key = void 0` why `key` would be considered 
> absent, exactly? `undefined` is a very well described "value", passing stuff 
> around thinking has a value but getting ignored by signatures and who knows 
> what else is a door to hell in the real world.
> 

void <expression>

simply evaluates expression and sets the return continuation value to undefined.

void 0 is identical to |undefined| unless a containing scope has declared a 
variable named “undefined” locally.  void … does not result in a special value.

—Oliver


> my 2 cents
> 
> 
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 1:30 PM, K. Gadd <[email protected]> wrote:
> JSIL and embind both need arguments.length for efficient method call dispatch 
> when dealing with overloaded functions. Is it your intent that all such 
> scenarios must now pay the cost of creating an array (to hold the rest 
> arguments) and then destructuring it, for every call? At present it's 
> possible to avoid this overhead in V8 and SpiderMonkey by using 
> arguments.length + arguments[n] or by using arguments.length + patterned 
> argument names.
> 
> Hi Katelyn,
> 
> No one is taking arguments away. Perhaps we would if we could but we can't. 
> So as I said just now to Allen, if you really need to do this, go ahead and 
> use arguments.length.
> 
> But do you really need to do this? Assuming for a moment that we were all 
> agreed that the best practice is to treat absence the same as undefined, why 
> not go with the best practice and be done?
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 1:24 PM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 10/11/2013 22:19, Brendan Eich a écrit :
> 
> On Nov 10, 2013, at 9:12 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Not sure why this is so needed though.
> Allen's posts make the case: webidl and varargs-style functions. Not all 
> legacy.
> WebIDL creates spec, not code. The language syntax doesn't need to evolve for 
> that. Allen showed that rest params+destructuring allows self-hosting without 
> |arguments|
> Varargs functions have rest parameters.
> 
> David
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>     Cheers,
>     --MarkM
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to