On 4 December 2013 11:03, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Olov did write "because val leaks to the outer scope". That's a reason for > the convenience of > > if (let x = ...) { /* x in scope here */ } > > (or const), vs. > > { let x = ...; if (x) { /* ... */ } } > > Braces count, this is winning in C++.
Yes, see the last sentence of my reply. What I (and presumably Axel) was puzzled about is why Olov said that he was forced to use 'let' instead of 'const'. /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
