> Good observation. However, if I were to simplify, I’d only keep #3. #1 and > #2 look more syntactically questionable to me (kind of abusing names as > keywords/markers). >
#1 is the base case because it is completely general. Any IdentifierName may appear in the "as" clause. export { x as delete, y as new, z as default }; // Perfectly fine! Of course, "default" has special meaning on the import side: import x from "package:foo"; Desugars (very beautifully) to: import { default as x } from "package:foo"; The sugaring on the import side is a clear win, but I'm not so sure about the sugarings on the export side.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss