#2 was removed at the hallway discussion of the face to face meeting. Do you still think we should remove #3?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good observation. However, if I were to simplify, I’d only keep #3. #1 and >> #2 look more syntactically questionable to me (kind of abusing names as >> keywords/markers). >> > > #1 is the base case because it is completely general. Any IdentifierName > may appear in the "as" clause. > > export { x as delete, y as new, z as default }; // Perfectly fine! > > Of course, "default" has special meaning on the import side: > > import x from "package:foo"; > > Desugars (very beautifully) to: > > import { default as x } from "package:foo"; > > The sugaring on the import side is a clear win, but I'm not so sure about > the sugarings on the export side. > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- erik
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
