> > > The point I was making in the meeting was that arrow functions are a > syntactic convenience for a common case, not a general-purpose replacement > for all functions that need to refer to an outer this-binding. They are not > general-purpose because they don't support all the features of longhand > functions.
I agree, and would go farther: at a conceptual level arrow functions represent lightweight functional mappings. We should avoid any desire which would muddy that concept.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
