Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
FWIW, function [A-Za-z_] includes `var expr = function expr() {}` or
`{expr: function expr(){}}` both quite common patterns (the first one
when you want to be able to debug the name of the function but due
inline, later on, features detection, the former might change)
Sure, I wasn't giving the exact regexen required for distinguishing
cases of NFEs from FDs, if you get my abbreviations :-).
Still I agree with David and asked again indeed what was the rationale
for arrow function that in my opinion solves only one very specific
case and nothing else ... came out in CoffeeScript that is the most
common case (I don't even understand why is that but ... hey, I don't
CoffeeScript so I believe that's OK)
Don't keep asking for rationales (a) that are already given, and (b)
that you don't like (whether they have objective groundings -- this one
does -- or not). We've been over this a zillion times. Didn't I already
refer you to Kevin's quantitative analysis in the last thread from October?
http://esdiscuss.org/topic/what-kind-of-problem-is-this-fat-arrow-feature-trying-to-solve#content-23
To rehash yet again, with an aggrieved tone, is just you being
aggressive for no purpose. Please stop. Arrows are in ES6. Take a deep
breath, get over it.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
