But to recap the TC39 meeting discussion, we do not believe we can add
=>* or =>! -- the latter is arrow with a unary logical negation
expression as the body. Other places to put the * and ! are problematic
due to ASI. So what exactly are we gonna do for async arrows, if
anything? We said no/defer to generator arrows.
/be
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
On Dec 11, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Yes. I think the reasons for wanting the "*", whether you agree with them or not, all
apply equally to "!" (or whatever the syntax is).
>
And if there is a syntactic flag like that, I don't see that we need to worry
about preserving anything that would only valid within explicitly flag context.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
