Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
I had same thoughts on being defined inside the class ... it's quite
common out there but here I see it's very easy to create conflicts
between classes.
What if a generic point2d + point3d is defined in both point2d class
and point3d one ?
The definitions need to be special forms, associated with one (if unary
operator) or two value classes -- if you include number as a value
class. Also, the value class declaration being memoized allows
cross-frame typeof equivalence for free. I forgot to mention this in my
last reply.
IIRC Python just consider it's own representation during one
operation, not associating it with "the caller" of such operation ...
actually, I've always been envious of these:
http://rgruet.free.fr/PQR26/PQR2.6.html#SpecialMethods
Value objects do not use double dispatch for dyadic operators, though.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
