There are three issues in my mind for tooling: 1) should the code be parsed as "use strict" 2) are "import" and "export" and "module" statements valid 3) should top level declarations be considered visible outside the file (no can be inferred from the presence of import or exports)
It is my guess that it will be a common beginner mistake to load modules as scripts or try to use "import" from scripts. The first is the primary one as keywords etc are different. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My argument was that Node.js has both non-module and module files with a >> common suffix, .js. >> > > Yes - but Node-modules and non-modules can be parsed the same way, so a > common extension makes sense. But when a file needs to be parsed a > different way in Node, how's that's done? By registered file extensions, > of course. > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
