On Fri Feb 7 06:50 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Yutaka Hirano <yhir...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Sorry for knowing little about ES "consensus", is this the final decision? > > Will you change it again? > > Yeah, some clarity would be nice. >
>From a user perspective, can someone explain what chain() does? Recently hit an issue with Q.all() vs serial execution of promises: https://github.com/jbondc/cordova-plugman/commit/ad2c74b3344c8899e8ede12827f7ca4637a01b6f#diff-9f06c51911da08ebd6400ff77d629c1eR309 chain() isn't mentioned here: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:concurrency Promise.all() is included in the spec but not the case for serial execution: http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-promise.all-resolve-element-functions What seems like a preferred api / pattern from an ecma PoV to serially execute promises? e.g. Promise.serial(), Promise.ordered(), Promise.follow() Is it a common enough use case to be included in the spec? _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
