On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:50 PM, C. Scott Ananian > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since both Chrome and FIrefox have plans to support Promises, feel > > free to suggest any changes to `es6-shim` which would improve > > compatibility. It looks like that at the moment the `es6-shim` > > implementation is more spec-compliant than either of the shipping > > implementations? In particular, we support subclasses. > > It will take a long time before browsers support subclassing in > general as far as I can tell. > I don't know where you're getting this from. @@create is the way classes and subclassing work in ES6, and any browser that wants to implement class syntax will need to deal with it. It may not be at the top of anyone's February 2014 hit-list, but I don't get any sense that classes are low priority for browser vendors either. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
