"thing" ... no "things", just this one ... pliiiiiiiiiz :-)
Also please note that this proposal simplifies [Object.assign(target, source)]( https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-object.assign) too since latter one is basically: ```javascript Object.defineProperties( target, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(source) ); ``` So, in order of priority or what is needed the most, I think with `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(O)` we can solve more than `Object.assign(target, source)` but bear in mind I am not pushing back the latter one anyhow. IMO this proposal is just very, very related to ES6 changes due Symbols but it should have probably been in ES5 too because there was defined `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor` which has been indeed upgraded to accept ES6 `Symbols` too. The spec as it is kinda a no-brainer, ready for copy and paste once reviewed, and simple enough I believe the implementation is straight forward, and I won't mind pushing a patch for V8 to start playing with. All this, of course, if everyone agrees and there is a consensus at the next meeting after Rick presentation. Best Regards On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:31 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[email protected]> wrote: > Is the committee establishes some preliminary functions for ES7 at the > next meeting, I'd be happy to start `es7-shim` right away. Perhaps > that will eliminate some of the pressure to squeeze things into ES6? > --scott >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
