So just so I get this straight. You're talking about a bytecode format, which implies some kind of revamped features/VM to run it, but you won't be discussing anything other than ECMAScript as the targeting semantic. Sorry to say, but then that's a pretty useless discussion entirely.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Till Schneidereit < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Florian Bösch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, if you're simply going to come up with a bytecode to match JS, then >> you're gonna have the same kinds of issues that typescript, asm.js, dart, >> etc. have to target it as a compile target. So if you want to make a VM >> that's a good compile target, ye're gonna have to eventually discuss what >> that actually means. >> > > Yes. But then this list would still not be the right venue, as that > bytecode wouldn't be EcmaScript. So this is off-topic regardless of what > you think of the merits of such a discussion. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
