On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I like this list. I prefer #c. > > * We have previously succeeded at making previously non-generic methods > > generic. I think we could get away with #c. > > * It is easier for a normal JS programmer to do the equivalent of #c for > > most of their classes. > > FWIW, if a change to the spec is needed, I also favor (c). > > Both generic options (b) and (c) have consistent behavior that can > extend to `#valueOf`. In option (b) you would presumably invoke > `Object#valueOf` and for option (c) you'd return the "zero" value. > Is this close-ish to a consensus? If so, we'd implement and land it on Nightly to get an idea of its web compatibility. It doesn't sound like there's a meaningful danger of implementing something seriously incompatible with what the spec is going to say - if (c) is roughly adopted.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
