On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure who introduced the idea that the Date.prototype should have a > "zero value", but that is inconsistent with ES3&5 where the TimeValue of > Date.prototype is NaN: > http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.9.5 If we went the > (c) route it should presumably be modified to use NaN and not 0.
Sorry, I was using quotes around "zero value" on purpose to mean, "the appropriate value for the given type" (which is not actually 0). Date should be NaN, boolean should be false, etc. I hope most of those reading understood this. --scott _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
