String.prototype.endsWith and Object.is are functions, and their JS implementations are nontrivial to memorize and type (although not the worst examples). Memorizing PI to more than a few digits is nontrivial. Same with Math.E, or Math.atan2, or most of the other Math functions and properties.
Remembering that PI*2 is TAO is required to even make use of it, unless/until mathematicians, books, and wikipedia start using TAO where 2 PI is currently used, you have to convert them. So if you decide to used it, you already know the definition. The alternative to other things in JavaScript (for the most part) spending time researching how to implement it, comparing existing implementations, or having to look up a constant value (e.g. 3.141592653589793). Seems a little silly, and I'd rather see some of the use cases for it end up on Math if anything. On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Alex Kocharin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 30.06.2014, 21:09, "C. Scott Ananian" <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Just because other languages don't include a TAU constant doesn't mean > ECMAScript cannot. > > Just because "serious mathematicians" think this is "crackpot territory", > doesn't mean it's not useful (the condescension of that claim certainly > isn't). > > > As I mentioned, although I am a pi-ist, I think Math.TAU is harmless. But > I will qualify the "not useful" part -- there is no numerical accuracy > benefit to using Math.TAU (only the floating point exponent changes), nor > is there likely to be any emitted-code improvement (constant propagation > being a standard part of any reasonable runtime). So the benefit is solely > the single character minimized code size improvement from '2*Math.PI' to > 'Math.TAU' (if this were significant wouldn't the minimizers be assigning > this to a single-character variable already?) > > > > It's not about code size or numerical accuracy. When developing HTML5 > games where a lot of trigonometric calculus takes place, I'm used to see > 2*Math.PI more often than Math.PI by itself. People usually treat it as one > single constant (which is prone to errors if someone writes 1/2*Math.PI > instead of 1/(2*Math.PI)). It's just better to replace it with one constant > than having this multiplication appear everywhere. > > So I'd like to see this make its way to the standard... it's certainly > more useful than, say, String.prototype.endsWith or Object.is :) > > // alex > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
