On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Dmitry Soshnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Will it makes sense to standardize a trailing comma for function arguments, > and call parameters?
Fwiw, it also makes sense in AMD, where the set of dependencies can grow and the desire to put every module on its own line becomes desirable. I tend to do it for the array since you can be consistent with the leading/trailing comma there, but not so much for the func args. Allowing an "empty" comma after the param list could fix that. Also allowing one before for the "comma-first" people would be nice. > But again, I already think that for the language itself, it won't be super > useful just yet, since backward-incompatible syntax won't allow using it > anyways for a long amount of time This argument doesn't hold for server side approaches like node, or build-step approaches like you use yourself. Also, if you apply this argument to any new syntax the language never changes, for better or worse ;) Anyways, +1 from me. I'm tired of irrelevant diff lines... - peter _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
