On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > RFC4329 rightly favors application/ -- but this is all beyond the scope of > ECMA-262. Do Not Want TC39 deciding suffixes. Let developers develop > conventions. (Just so long as they do not sound like skin diseases.)
Well the default browser loader which is still secret(?) purportedly standardizes on a "js" suffix. That is probably why this came up. (I think text/javascript is just fine btw. text/* works great for HTML and CSS too. In any event, for the purposes of the browser JavaScript does not really have a MIME type. We parse anything we get...) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
