Aha. I wasn't aware of Object.setPrototypeOf. That sounds like it will solve my use case. Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Alex Kocharin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please show an example of the code you're using __proto__ in. > > I'm sure it can be rewritten with Object.setPrototypeOf. > > > 23.09.2014, 01:46, "Jasper St. Pierre" <[email protected]>: > > I have used __proto__ simply because it allows for a feature nothing else > has: to change the [[Prototype]] of a callable / constructor. > > This isn't the same as "with" or other backward-compatibility hacks. It's > a feature that I need to fake out some other code that uses "instanceof" > and also be callable. > > If there's a better way to do this, please let me know. > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Grurnbaum <[email protected]> > wrote: > > My point was that I don't believe that putting the standard library in > modules would help with people using the current library. Even in 5 years. > > I mentioned __proto__ as an example for something that didn't go away > although it wasn't supported by a major browser and wasn't specced (to the > point it got specced). I don't think 'with' is going anywhere soon either. > The "fresh copy" argument sounds good though. > > > On 23 בספט׳ 2014, at 00:07, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Not deprecated -- any reason you brought it up in the context of 'with'? > > > > /be > > > > John Barton wrote: > >> Is __proto__ deprecated by TC39? The spec says otherwise. > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > > -- > Jasper > , > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Jasper
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
