Right, it was a typo. Consider `0xFW`. Nevertheless the question remains, what kind of error will such cases produce?
Denis. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Caitlin Potter wrote: > >> I’m not sure what the problem with `0xFE` is supposed to be, though? >> > > Right, 0xFE is a fine hex literal. One must remember all the punning uses > of hex: 0xFEEDFACE, 0xFEEDBABE, 0xCAFE, etc. > > /be >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
