Thanks. Denis.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote: > According to 11.8.3, you'll get a syntax error – they won't even be > parsed, because they are not syntactically legal. > > > [[[Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity and typos.]]] > > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > [email protected] > http://rauschma.de > > On 15.10.2014, at 10:18, Den Tuzhik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right, it was a typo. Consider `0xFW`. > > Nevertheless the question remains, what kind of error will such cases > produce? > > Denis. > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Caitlin Potter wrote: >> >>> I’m not sure what the problem with `0xFE` is supposed to be, though? >>> >> >> Right, 0xFE is a fine hex literal. One must remember all the punning uses >> of hex: 0xFEEDFACE, 0xFEEDBABE, 0xCAFE, etc. >> >> /be >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
