Would those of you who consider yourselves RegExp experts take a look at
https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519 Is this a bug? If so, what is
the fix?
This construction for Identity Escape goes back to Norbert's original proposal
http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/index.html
Perhaps we need to add a:
ClassAttom[U] :: [+U] \-
production or some such to the pattern grammar.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
